Just like the waistcoat this was a mini redraft of the Ron Davis pattern. It was meant to help iron out problem areas and to practice the parts I had found difficult. Didn't work out that way. Oops.
the black and white is in the interests of general sanity |
This was a menace to make- though not in the expected places- pockets went in smoothly ( yes, they are workable pockets), facings and pad stitching happened uneventfully but everything else....! The sequence of making still is a bit of an enigma - every option seemed to lead to more problems than solutions. And then I cut the wrong flappy bit when trimming out the excess seam allowances at the back of the arm hole. Unable to cut a new back piece it was a case of make the sleeve fit - which is why there are fewer pleats on the sleeve head than planned and about a centimetre less shoulder.
The other major adjustment was to go from sizing it to fit over the waistcoat to just fitting Gwen's torso - over a centimetre difference. This may not sound a lot but the coat was left looking like a giant tube - only touching on the shoulder. The major darts down from the collar were the solution- saw similar on some 1940 tailoring - think they look pretty good - or at least intentional.
in full glory |
oddly good with the waistcoat? |
This has left more queries and questions about construction methods - so probably another Gwen coat will have to be made to sort these out. But not yet. Definitely not yet.
trouble is - quite like it inside out with the patched lining showing! |
As for research......... did extensive practical research into the tides at Sandsend, the availability of icecream, and also tested the extreme steepness of the steps going up on top of the ness. Results were - 1. sea water is wet, 2. prefer Yordale's selection ( rhubarb and ginger or lemon curd), 3. very steep. That was Monday.
Tuesday's research was more relevant - tried out Leeds Museum, the art gallery, the markets, some very posh tailoring shops- don't know how they do it!, and the newish park and ride from Elland Road. Conclusion - my feet hurt, and 'interactive museum exhibition' means things to bash or buttons to press aimed at the under 5s, and got a lot to learn about tailoring. The trip also involved finding Fabworks fabric emporium in Dewsbury - worth a foraging trip, especially for suitings and other things than quilter's cotton. Hurrah! Parked in a bramble.
Day 3 - proper job - went to Lotherton Hall just beyond Tadcaster. This is part of the Leeds Museums group- Edwardian house, with a costume gallery (says so on the map).
The house is better inside than out and the costume gallery was hosting 'Dressed for Battle', showing the influence of military styling on fashion. Not bad at all, Regency dress next to an 1807 Leeds Volunteers tailcoat, later Victorian and Edwardian pieces against a Hussar jacket with a sprinkling of Alexander McQueen bits, First World War dresses and of course 1940s things, including a 'New Look' style suit. The blurb made it seem more extensive than it was but it was trying hard and was of interest. As in all museums there seems to be a passion for putting black clothes on display in unlit dark boxes - what is the point? Why display something if it can't be seen? ( worst offender presently is Leeds central) And what about seeing all the way round the objects ? Finding their blog site could prove a useful reference- http://www.leeds.gov.uk/museumsandgalleries/secretlivesofobjects/Pages/posts.aspx?BID=117.
Will admit to spending a happy half hour with the bird collection -
there were some fantastically grumpy looking pigeons, a sunbathing condor and a very confused turaco. A diversion? - perhaps not - lots of subtle colour and pattern combinations to ponder on - The deer were less inspirational - being very deery, and in the deer park not the bird garden. Didn't try the icecream - may have to return.
Were actually meant to be researching bustle dresses and looking for the next inspiration after that. Good job managed to fit it in round the edges. Still like the grumpy birds best.
No comments:
Post a Comment